A decorated Royal Navy veteran says he was left reeling after being told he owed more than £18,000 because of a pension error he had no part in creating.
Thomas Meadows, 73, who served for 35 years and received the Meritorious Service Medal, discovered his Armed Forces pension had been overpaid for almost a decade after receiving an unexpected letter in February.
The correspondence informed him that an accounting mistake had resulted in him receiving too much money over a nine-year period and that the sum would now have to be repaid.
According to information provided to Mr Meadows, the overpayment stemmed from an error involving a National Insurance adjustment made when he reached state pension age.
The calculation should have reduced his Armed Forces pension at that point. However, an inflation-linked increase was then incorrectly applied again, creating an overpayment which grew over several years.
The mistake was identified in 2024, according to information obtained from the Ministry of Defence through a Freedom of Information request secured by the Forces Pension Society.
Mr Meadows said the letter came as a complete surprise.
"It was a great shock to receive the letter," he said.
"It wasn't even signed with a name, there was just a number. But when I called, it was answered by a young lady who couldn't help at all."
The Forces Pension Society says Mr Meadows is far from alone.
Chief executive Major General Neil Marshall said the organisation is aware of hundreds of cases involving Armed Forces pension overpayments, states the Daily Mail.
The not-for-profit group, which acts as an independent pension watchdog for the military community, says some cases involve demands for several thousand pounds, while others run into tens of thousands. A small number are reportedly worth more than £100,000.
Mr Marshall said the cases arise from a range of issues.
"These arise from policy errors and miscalculations relating to pension sharing on divorce, early departure payments, guaranteed minimum payments, guaranteed income payments and National Insurance adjustments," he said.
"When an overpayment is discovered, attempts will be made to recover the historic overpayment, at the same time as adjusting future payments downwards."
"This often happens to members in retirement, when their life plans have been made, their standard of living is set and they lack the wherewithal to earn money to return overpayments."
Mr Meadows lives with his daughter Gemma and granddaughter Faye and says the financial implications are still being worked through.
His monthly pension has already fallen from around £1,150 to approximately £950 while administrators adjust for the miscalculation.
A decision has not yet been reached on how the £18,200 overpayment will be repaid.
Mr Meadows also receives a pension inherited from his late wife and income from a role at a garden centre, where he has worked since leaving the Royal Navy in 2002.
Even so, he says the reduction in his pension has created fresh concerns.
"As you can imagine, I am very upset by this error. I've made a complaint and not agreed to a repayment plan yet," he said.
"The reduction in my pension is a worry. I used to go clay target shooting but it's quite expensive so I don't do that so much any more. The cost of fuel has gone up too."
Major General Marshall said many pensioners have questioned the calculations used to determine overpayments but struggle to obtain detailed explanations.
He argued that veterans who received the payments in good faith should not be left carrying the burden of administrative mistakes.
"We recognise the principle of recovering public monies that have been overpaid," he said.
"But we also think it wrong that the scheme administrator who has made the error should attempt to recover the money from members who have acted in good faith."
The Armed Forces pension scheme is administered by several organisations. Defence Business Services and Veterans UK operate within the Ministry of Defence and oversee pension decisions, while payments are made by private-sector firm Equiniti.
Mr Marshall added: "It seems to us that the requirement to refund the public purse should lie with Veterans UK and Equiniti."
Retired Royal Navy captain Nick Fletcher said he was also contacted earlier this year about an alleged overpayment, states the report.
Mr Fletcher, 69, received a letter the day after his birthday informing him that almost £20,000 would need to be repaid.
He has submitted a complaint and requested a detailed breakdown of the calculations behind the demand.
Living in Hampshire and serving as the voluntary chairman of a charity, he says his pension payments have already been reduced by around £600 a month.
He fears agreeing to a repayment plan could lead to a further deduction of a similar size.
"It's a very unfair business and, frankly, a complete shambles," he said.
"I know there are people in very difficult circumstances."
A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: "Where payments have been made in error, we have a responsibility to recover taxpayer funds and will always seek to do so in a sensitive and proportionate way."
"This includes... sensible repayment schedules. Through Veterans Services, we provide one-to-one support to veterans and their families facing challenges."
Equiniti said it "supports in the recovery of overpayments" and "works to ensure that all members receive the correct information and appropriate support".
The Forces Pension Society advises anyone receiving an overpayment letter to first confirm it is genuine before seeking further information in writing.
The organisation also recommends contacting an MP for assistance and using the Armed Forces pension scheme's Internal Dispute Resolution Procedure before escalating complaints to the Pensions Ombudsman if necessary.
